1 ISDA Collateral Review 2022, CCP12 Q4’22 PQD
Daily average VM margin moves to CCPs are large ($32.3bn in Q4’21) and volatile, peaking at $140bn in March 20222. Initial margin held at CCPs increased by $415bn in March 2020 (about 40% on average levels).
Understanding liquidity drivers, and being able to forecast margin requirements, significantly impacts your liquidity requirements.
Rubicon provides the information necessary to take these decisions:
This aide to liquidity decision making and LCR forecasting enables firms to reduce excess liquidity saving HQLA costs.
2 BIS-IOSCO Review of Margin Practices, Oct 2021
Over $2,000bn collateral assets are tied up in initial margin and CCP default fund contributions. XVA desks typically look to price the incremental cost of funding this margin into new transactions and take actions to reduce the overall margin funding cost across multiple CCP and bilateral collateral pools.
Insight and data are the foundation of effective margin optimisation. The key challenges are: i) to have access to timely and accurate information on the breakdown of each margin requirement and details of the assets in each collateral pool, ii) access to initial margin calculations, and iii) ability to consolidate bilateral and cleared margin information on a single platform.
Rubicon provides the information necessary to take these decisions:
3 ISDA Collateral Review 2022, CCP12 Q4’22 PQD
$1,274bn Variation Margin4 reported from bilateral CSA. Banks also have significant VM at CCPs where VM in aggregate is a passthrough for CCP but individual clearing members, and their clients, have significant positions.
The difference between cash remuneration at each CCP (or CSA) in each currency and the bank’s internal cost of funds (FTP) drives the net funding cost. Many firms will look to establish a term profile of their VM requirements and fund margin for a holding period (eg 1 month) or to full term.
Rubicon provides the information necessary to take these decisions:
4 ISDA Collateral Review 2022
CCP (and clearing broker) fees are a significant cost of clearing yet visibility over their charges is generally poor with many extra costs added: membership fees, fees and interest remuneration and costs per location, ccy and collateral type (separating VM, IM, Buffer Margin and Default Funds). Any analysis of the Total Cost of Clearing must include fees as well as margin funding costs.
Our fees module gives you visibility over all fees and charges empowering you to take the necessary actions to minimise these costs and potentially allocate internally to users.
Rubicon provides the information necessary to take these decisions:
The FIA reviews more than 60 CCPs in more than 30 countries.5
Building and maintaining connectivity to CCPs is complex with each CCP having its own proprietary set of reports and unique data format. Once extracted the raw data will need to be mapped to a database such that users can access the information. All this is expensive to build and to maintain.
Kynec uses leading digital technologies to orchestrate data from multiple sources and create a single, secure ‘golden source’ of timely and accurate collateral information for analysis and communication to internal and external stakeholders.
Permission Kynec to access your data at the CCP and we do the rest; no internal development required.
Our clearing platform:
5CCP Risk Review - FIA Documentation Services